* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Minor enhancement, but a valuable one imv. Hopefully there aren't any
> > issues with it. :)
>
> 1. Why %o? That's not obviously mnemonic. Perhaps %U?
r was taken? :) I'm not sure I like %U, but in the end I don't *really*
care. I'll update it to %U and wait for someone else to complain.
> 2. It won't be clear to people reading this what the difference is
> between %u and this. You probably need to reword the documentation
> for the existing option as well as documenting the new one.
Fair enough.
> 3. Please attach the patch rather than including it inline, if possible.
Hrm, I could have sworn that Tom had asked for the exact opposite in the
past, but either way is fine by me.
Stephen
