Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > I think the difficulty is figuring out what to get the existing
> > workers to give us some memory when a new one comes along. You want
> > the first worker to potentially use ALL the memory... until worker #2
> > arrives.
>
> Yeah, doing this would mean that you couldn't give worker #1 all the
> memory, because on most OSes it can't release the memory even if it
> wants to.
FYI, what normally happens in this case is that the memory is pushed to
swap by the kernel and never paged in from swap.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
