Re: large dataset with write vs read clients - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: large dataset with write vs read clients
Date
Msg-id 20101007185748.GZ26232@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: large dataset with write vs read clients  (Dan Harris <fbsd@drivefaster.net>)
List pgsql-performance
* Dan Harris (fbsd@drivefaster.net) wrote:
>  On 10/7/10 11:47 AM, Aaron Turner wrote:
>> Basically, each connection is taking about 100MB resident.  As we need
>> to increase the number of threads to be able to query all the devices
>> in the 5 minute window, we're running out of memory.
> I think the first thing to do is look into using a connection pooler
> like pgpool to reduce your connection memory overhead.

Yeah..  Having the number of database connections be close to the number
of processors is usually recommended.

    Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dan Harris
Date:
Subject: Re: large dataset with write vs read clients
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: large dataset with write vs read clients