Re: large dataset with write vs read clients - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dan Harris
Subject Re: large dataset with write vs read clients
Date
Msg-id 4CAE1192.5080807@drivefaster.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to large dataset with write vs read clients  (Aaron Turner <synfinatic@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: large dataset with write vs read clients  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-performance
  On 10/7/10 11:47 AM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> <snip>
>
> Basically, each connection is taking about 100MB resident.  As we need
> to increase the number of threads to be able to query all the devices
> in the 5 minute window, we're running out of memory.
I think the first thing to do is look into using a connection pooler
like pgpool to reduce your connection memory overhead.

-Dan

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: large dataset with write vs read clients