Robert Haas wrote:
> In response to a complaint from Hartmut Goebel:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00018.php
>
> And per a design proposed by Tom Lane:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00211.php
>
> PFA a patch to implement $SUBJECT. One interesting aspect of this
> patch is that types like "integer" and "double precision" don't get
> quoted in the output, whereas types like "text" do. But it turns out
> that types like "integer" and "double precision" don't *work* if
> they're quoted, so this is not a bad thing. It might possibly be
> judged to require documentation somewhere, however.
Uh, I thought this was about quoting the identifiers. I am confused
about why "integer" is an issue in this case. Can you show an example?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
