Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
> >
> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
>
> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that. Who wants to do it?
Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
and recoveryEndCommand.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
