Hi.
I hope I'm not going to expose an already known problem, but I couldn't find
it mailing list archives (I only found http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-
hackers/2009-12/msg01543.php).
On one of my (non production) machines, I've just seen a very big performance
regression (I was doing a very simple insert test). I had an 'old' 8.4
postgresql compiled a few month ago, performing very well, and my 'bleeding
edge' 9.0, doing the same insert very slowly.
I managed to find the cause of the regression : with Linux 2.6.33, O_DSYNC is
now available. With glibc 2.12, O_DSYNC is available in userspace. Having both
(they are both very new, 2.12 isn't even official on glibc website), my new
build defaulted to open_datasync. The problem is that it is much slower. I
tested it on 2 small machines (no big raid, just basic machines, with SATA or
software RAID).
Here is the trivial test :
The configuration is the default configuration, just after initdb
CREATE TABLE test (a int);
CREATE INDEX idxtest on test (a);
with wal_sync_method = open_datasync (new default)
marc=# INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1,100000);
INSERT 0 100000
Time: 16083,912 ms
with wal_sync_method = fdatasync (old default)
marc=# INSERT INTO test SELECT generate_series(1,100000);
INSERT 0 100000
Time: 954,000 ms
Doing synthetic benchmarks with test_fsync:
open_datasync performance, glibc 2.12, 2.6.34, 1 SATA drive
Simple 8k write timing:
write 0.037511
Compare file sync methods using one 8k write:
open_datasync write 56.998797
open_sync write 168.653995
write, fdatasync 55.359279
write, fsync 166.854911
Compare file sync methods using two 8k writes:
open_datasync write, write 113.342738
open_sync write, write 339.066883
write, write, fdatasync 57.336820
write, write, fsync 166.847923
Compare open_sync sizes:
16k open_sync write 169.423723
2 8k open_sync writes 336.457119
Compare fsync times on write() and new file descriptors (if the times
are similar, fsync() can sync data written on a different descriptor):
write, fsync, close 166.264048
write, close, fsync 168.702035
This is it, I just wanted to raise an alert on this: the degradation was 16-
fold with this test. We wont see linux 2.6.33 + glibc 2.12 in production
before months (I hope), but shouldn't PostgreSQL use fdatasync by default with
Linux, seeing the result ?
By the way, I re-did my tests with both 2.6.33, 2.6.34 and 2.6.35-rc1 and got
the exact same result (O_DSYNC there, obviously, but also the performance
degradation).
Cheers
Marc
