David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs are not
> > in core, but...
> >
> > I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will
> > make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically
> > partitioned table robust. By robust, I mean to elimination the
> > update anomalies that can occur from the view point client side
> > optimistic locking where the virtual row appears to be
> > inconsistently updated.
>
> I'm not sure I understand. When the concurrency issues in writeable
> CTEs get fixed, they could become a mechanism for doing what you
> describe, but I suspect there would be significant work involved in
> harnessing them to that task.
>
> They'll be pretty nice even without the automated view stuff, though :)
If the user wants to submit it, fine, but neither Tom nor I are excited
about it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
