> My "stand-alone" means libSQL can be used from many modules
> without duplicated codes. For example, copy routines for raw
> parse trees should be in the DLL rather than in postgres.exe.
>
> Then, we need to consider other products than pgpool. Who will
> use the dll? If pgpool is the only user, we might not allow to
> modify core codes only for one usecase. More research other than
> pgpool is required to decide the interface routines for libSQL.
If the user of the new API is only pgpool-II, I hadn't made the
propose in the first place. It's a waste of time and I would rather
keep on borrowing the parse code. I thought there were several people
who needed the API as well in the cluster meeting. If somebody who
made such a vote in the meeting is on the list, please express your
opinion for the API.
I'm not in the position of speaking for other products.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
