Bill Moran escribió:
> One thing that a lot of people seem to get confused about is that they
> subconsciously think that ints or bigints take up less space when the
> numbers are small. I.e.: I want to use an int for my state identifier
> instead of the 2-digit code, because it will use less space -- wrong,
> an int is 4 bytes, but a 2 byte char column is 1/2 that ... even if the
> number never gets higher than 50.
Eh, a 2 byte char column uses 3 bytes -- there's one byte of overhead.
(Unless one of the chars is multibyte in which case it can be longer).
Earlier versions of Postgres use 6 bytes to store the 2 chars (4 bytes
of overhead), so it would be larger than the int.
Not that this invalidates the argument -- just nitpicking here.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
