Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > As far as "...", those are used to show only the important changes in
> > the string, which I think is the right approach, but I did change the
> > line so the dots are not right up against slashes:
> > archive_command = 'test ! -f ... %f && cp %p ... %f'
>
> This is *not* an improvement, because it makes it look like the %f is a
> separate command argument. Please revert if you can't think of
> something better.
What about:
archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f && cp %p ...%f'
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
