Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date
Msg-id 201002261825.o1QIP4525584@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-committers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > -----------
> > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > > previous patch.
> > >
> > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,
>
> The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points

We don't usually modify past release notes.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert