Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date
Msg-id 1267208448.20134.1165.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
List pgsql-committers
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > -----------
> > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > previous patch.
> >
> > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,

The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points

> nor does the perf tips
> > section.

Only that one.

> > Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we
> > should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or
> > haven't you? I know we discussed it).
>
> Good point.  Documentation patch attached and applied.
>
--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Suggest gmake installcheck-world for pgindent testing.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert