Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date
Msg-id 1267209439.20134.1231.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
List pgsql-committers
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > > > previous patch.
> > > >
> > > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,
> >
> > The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points
>
> We don't usually modify past release notes.

Cool, but my comment has nothing to do with that. Please reread.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Next
From: momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Document ATAPI drive flush command, and mention SSD drives.