Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's the same as this:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=263
Yes, (2) are resolved with the patch with a different implementation.
> (2) is fixed by RegisterXactCallback(AtEOXact_dblink). However, there
> might be any better solutions -- for example, ResourceOwner framework.
(1) still exists, but we had a consensus that we don't have to fix it
because we have async functions.
> (1) is fixed by using non-blocking APIs in libpq. I think we should
> always use non-blocking APIs even if the dblink function itself is
> a blocking-function.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
