Re: pg_buffercache's usage count - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_buffercache's usage count
Date
Msg-id 20100224140219.GC3790@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_buffercache's usage count  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_buffercache's usage count
List pgsql-general
Greg Smith wrote:
> Ben Chobot wrote:
> >On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Ben Chobot wrote:
> >
> >>I'm looking at the usage count column of pg_buffercache's info, and I'm confused. Several buffers that supposed
haveLRU values of 5 belong to non-unique indices which supposedly have never been used. As I understand things, that
shouldn'thappen. Am I missing something? 
> >
> >(And maybe more to the point, when does the LRU go down in value?)
>
> Usage counts only go up when a page is "pinned" because some backend
> requested that particular block for its work via a call to
> BufferAlloc with the file/block it needs.

BTW the only reason you don't see buffers having a larger "usage" is
that the counters are capped at that value.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff
Date:
Subject: Curious plperl behavior
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Row ordering after CREATE TABLE AS...SELECT regexp_split_to_table(source_text, regexp) AS new_column