Re: BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze
Date
Msg-id 20100210191924.GQ4922@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze  ("Jerry Gamache" <jerry.gamache@idilia.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze
List pgsql-bugs
Jerry Gamache wrote:
> I was not able to repro with default parameters, or at 15s naptime,
> and at 1s naptime I got only 1deadlock in 3 tests.
>
> This time the deadlock was with table_a, table_b and table_c
> (table_x and table_y were not involved).
>
>   18395 | database1 | autovacuum: ANALYZE public.table_a
>   18406 | database1 | autovacuum: ANALYZE public.table_b
>   18510 | database1 |
>                            : CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_bg ON table_b
> USING btree (col_g);
>   18567 | database1 | autovacuum: ANALYZE public.table_c
>   18802 | database1 | select procpid,datname,current_query from
> pg_stat_activity where datname='database1' ORDER BY procpid;
>
> There is a FK constraint between table_a and table_b, but table_c
> does not have any direct constraint relation with the other 2
> tables.
>
> The logs show that the autovacuum of table_b was canceled 20 minutes
> ago, but the thread is still alive and blocked.

That's pretty strange.  Can we see a pg_locks snapshot?  (Please attach
as a text file so that it doesn't get word-wrapped)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgr. 8.2
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5321: Parallel restore temporarily deadlocked by autovacuum analyze