Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 201001292101.o0TL1b002310@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> (4) The 8.3 issue wasn't nearly as bad as Tom is making it out to be.
> Yes, there was a lot of WTF going on, but only by people that aren't
> paying attention anyway and the work to fix it was pretty nominal.

The big mistake we made in 8.3 is not having those compatibility
functions that Peter created ready _at_ _release_ _time_.  I believe
that was pure sloppiness on our part.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings