Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takahiro Itagaki
Subject Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date
Msg-id 20100122094504.E4A7.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> What I do think is that the quoted code snippet has no business being
> outside the planner proper.  It'd be better to put it in planner.c
> or someplace like that.

Ah, I see. My concern was the dummy planner approach is using internal
functions of planner. It would be better if planner module exports
a cost estimate function for cluster.

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)