Leonardo F <m_lists@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Anyone? I'd like some feedback before moving on to do the seq scan + sort in those
> CLUSTER cases where "use_index_scan" returns false...
+1 for CLUSTER using sort.
I have a couple of comments for the current implementation:* Do we need to disable sort-path for tables clustered on a
gistindex?* I'd prefer to separate cost calculation routines from create_index_path() and cost_sort(), rather than
usinga dummy planner.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
