Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takahiro Itagaki
Subject Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20100105120050.ABF0.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Verifying variable names in pgbench
List pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> We can remove the complexity if we give up showing the command (arg0)
> in error messages. Shall we remove it? Simplified patch attached.

Here is the proposal for the arg0 issue.
I added "context" argument to putVariable(). The context is a command
name for \setXXX commands, 'option' for -D option, or 'startup' for
internal assignment in startup.

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Does parallel make require guards against duplicate actions?
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Does parallel make require guards against duplicate actions?