Tom Lane wrote:
> But my recollection of the parallel psql patch discussion is that it was
> rejected because nobody felt comfortable with the API design. Do we
> have any better ideas in that department yet?
It wasn't rejected AFAICT. A finalized API with which there was
(almost?) no dissent was posted by you, after a design/path from Greg
Stark. The problem is that nobody stepped up to implementing that spec.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
