* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > I assume he's talking about the object reference representation used in
> > pg_depend, which is actually class OID + object OID + sub-object ID.
> > The only object type that has sub-objects at the moment is tables,
> > wherein the sub-objects are columns and the sub-object IDs are column
> > numbers. The sub-object ID is zero for all other cases.
>
> You're right, of course, but for some reason I thought that there was
> another usage of it besides just the table/column case.
Ah, I realize what I was thinking about now.. The dependency system has
two flavors (pg_depend and pg_shdepend). We had SubIDs for columns in
pg_depend but not pg_shdepend- until column-level privs were added which
meant we could have roles depend on columns (due to privileges on that
column). To clarify- pg_depend is for database dependencies while
pg_shdepend is for cluster dependencies.
Thanks,
Stephen
