Re: New VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: New VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 20091207165526.9550.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New VACUUM FULL  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: New VACUUM FULL  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> You should take those out again; if I am the committer I certainly will.
> Such a test will guarantee complete instability of every other
> regression test, and it's not worth it.

I read the original comment was saying to add regression tests for
database-wide vacuums. But I'll reduce the range of vacuum if they
are not acceptable.

The new patch contains only table-based vacuum for local tables and some of
system tables to test non-INPLACE vacuum are not used for system tables.
    VACUUM FULL pg_am;
    VACUUM FULL pg_class;
    VACUUM FULL pg_database;

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: named generic constraints [feature request]
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Reading recovery.conf earlier