Tom Lane escribió:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency
> > should be included even in the first pass.
>
> I think a design that is limited to a prespecified set of GUCs is
> broken by definition. It'd be better to make it work like
> ALTER DATABASE SET.
Well, not exactly like ALTER DATABASE SET because those are now stored
in pg_db_role_setting. But a new spcoptions column storing an array of
key/value pairs seems a reasonable way to do it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
