Re: Regexp confusion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Regexp confusion
Date
Msg-id 20091009233713.GI5303@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Regexp confusion  (Doug Gorley <doug.gorley@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Regexp confusion
Re: Regexp confusion
List pgsql-general
Doug Gorley escribió:
> Trying to match some numbers, and I'm having some regexp problems.
> I've boiled it down to the following:
>
> /* (1) */   select '3.14' similar to E'^\\d+\\.\\d+$';       -- true
> /* (2) */   select '3.14' similar to E'^\\d+(\\.\\d+)$';     -- true
> /* (3) */   select '3.14' similar to E'^\\d+(\\.\\d+)*$';    -- true
> /* (4) */   select '3.14' similar to E'^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$';    -- false
> /* (5) */   select '3.14' similar to E'^\\d+(\\.\\d+)+$';    -- true
>
> So, based on (1) and (2), the pattern '\.\d+' occurs once.  So why
> does (4) return false?  between (3), (4), and (5), it appears as
> though the group is matching multiple times.

I think the confusion is about what SIMILAR TO supports.  ? it doesn't.
See here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/functions-matching.html#FUNCTIONS-SIMILARTO-REGEXP

You probably want to use ~ instead of SIMILAR TO.

(SIMILAR TO is a weird beast that the SQL committee came up with,
vaguely based on regular expressions.)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michal Szymanski
Date:
Subject: transaction ID wraparound - should I use 'VACUUM' or 'VACUUM FULL' ?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: transaction ID wraparound - should I use 'VACUUM' or 'VACUUM FULL' ?