Re: Shipping documentation untarred - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Shipping documentation untarred
Date
Msg-id 200908111242.36963.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shipping documentation untarred  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Shipping documentation untarred  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Shipping documentation untarred  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 10 August 2009 21:53:57 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I understand that the placement of the generated docs in the sourcedir
> instead of the builddir is so that it is included in the tarball,
> correct?  I admit I was surprised by that change.

I did point that out upthread, with you in particular in mind. ;-)

I've been thinking that we could actually get rid of that build-in-srcdir 
behavior, which also occasionally puzzles vpath users with respect to gram.c 
and so on.  The new behavior would be to build targets in the local directory.  
The only requirement would be that distribution tarballs be built in-tree, so 
that the stuff that is distprep'ed actually ends up in the tarball, but I 
think that should not be a problem.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Next
From: Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Table and Index compression