Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended
Date
Msg-id 20090807211742.GH5290@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > > Bruce asked me to look for places in the docs that mention that an
> > > ANALYZE is recommended, to mention the possibility that autovacuum takes
> > > care.  This patch does that.
> > 
> > I think you found the right places to touch, but is "let the autovacuum
> > daemon do it" sufficient?  It seems like that needs some qualifiers
> > about whether autovacuum is enabled, how long you should expect to wait
> > for the stats to get updated, etc.  It's probably not a good idea to
> > duplicate all that in each place, but maybe a link to the main
> > documentation about autovacuum is reasonable in each place.
> 
> Sorry this fell through the cracks.  How does this look?  My idea would
> be to backpatch it to 8.3 and 8.4.

Committed, but backpatched to 8.4 only.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Emmanuel Cecchet
Date:
Subject: Re: Durability?
Next
From: Neil Best
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] \copy: unexpected response (4)