Re: security checks for largeobjects? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: security checks for largeobjects?
Date
Msg-id 20090622152227.GA4280@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > > The todo list says, as follows:
> > > > * Binary Data
> > > >   o Add security checks for large objects
> > > >
> > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
> > >
> > > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> > > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.
> >
> > This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion.  Perhaps the
> > TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.
> 
> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, 
> no?

It depends on your definition.  The lo interface is pretty much to
objects on the file system directly.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?