Re: security checks for largeobjects? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: security checks for largeobjects?
Date
Msg-id 18600.1245684705@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, 
>> no?

> It depends on your definition.  The lo interface is pretty much to
> objects on the file system directly.

LO's are transaction-controlled, and they're not (readily) accessible
from outside the database.  Seems rather completely different from
regular filesystem files.

(In any case, there wasn't anything I liked about SQL/MED's ideas about
external files, so I'm not in favor of modeling LO management after that.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?