Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> I thought he was asking for a solution to the problem of WALInsertLock
>>> contention. In any case, we have "WAL bypass on a table by table basis"
>>> now, don't we?
>>>
>
>
>> If we do I'm ignorant of it ;-) How do we say "Never WAL this table"?
>>
>
> Make it a temporary table.
>
>
>
That doesn't help if you need the data visible in multiple sessions. But
we're digressing from the original topic. Sorry.
cheers
andrew