Re: security checks for largeobjects? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: security checks for largeobjects?
Date
Msg-id 200906221718.51670.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: security checks for largeobjects?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > The todo list says, as follows:
> > > * Binary Data
> > >   o Add security checks for large objects
> > >
> > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
> >
> > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.
>
> This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion.  Perhaps the
> TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.

MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, 
no?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?