Tom Lane escribió:
> Hmm, maybe we need to improve the code too. This example suggests that
> there needs to be some limit on the worker launch rate, even if there
> are so many databases that that means we don't meet naptime exactly.
We already have a 100ms lower bound on the sleep time (see
launcher_determine_sleep()). Maybe that needs to be increased?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
