Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Date
Msg-id 20090427185412.GP1539@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > "advanced" section?  They've been standard for many years.  Heck,
> > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > many years.
>
> Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> to mean basic.

Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic?  Seriously?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: XML documentation question
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: XML documentation question