Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Date
Msg-id 20090427200232.GF10358@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-docs
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > > "advanced" section?  They've been standard for many years.  Heck,
> > > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > > many years.
> >
> > Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> > to mean basic.
>
> Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic?  Seriously?

Five years from now, are we going to move "recursive queries" to the
basic section?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: XML documentation question
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation