Re: currval, lastval, nextvar? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?
Date
Msg-id 20090423161739.GA8570@tux
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> "A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com> writes:
> > Yes. You don't need call nextval.
>
> Well, you do, but the point is that the default expression for a
> serial column includes the nextval() call.  Look at the table with
> \d, eg
>
> So if you do an insert that doesn't provide a value for that column,
> the nextval is done implicitly.

Right, i know.

You don't need call nextval _explicit_, okay?



Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.                              (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly."   (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?