Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From steven king
Subject Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
Date
Msg-id 20090421182911.311010@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:36:19 -0400
> Von: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
> An: steven king <vacuum@quantentunnel.de>
> CC: Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, listas@guedesoft.net
> Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
> > SWITCH <expression>
> > CASE <key_value> TABLE <table> [IN <table_space>]
> > CASE <key_value> TABLE <table> [IN <table_space>]
> > DEFAULT <table> [IN <table_space>]
> >
> > that is generic
> 
> Rather than SWITCH <expression> CASE <value> ... you probably would
> want to reuse the existing PostgreSQL syntax of CASE <expression> WHEN
> <value>...

I think - at first we've to ask for the problem we have to solve.

The syntax it isnt. If we get confused with CASE of CASE THEN ELSE - we can use other keywords .. forinstance SWITCH
<expression>ON <value> USE ... that should not the problem.
 

You talking about 1000s of partitions - I cant see that this is the major use-case of table partitioning .. Who wants
thousandsof partitions?
 

We simply need a tool to create partitions for common use-cases. Maybe we should provide two or more types of
partitioningstrategies. 
 

1. key-range partitioning
2. constraint exclusion partitioning 
3.? auto-partitioning (for performance issues only)
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] License Issue