Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Nikhil Sontakke wrote:
> >> Warrants an entry in the TODO items list:
> >>
> >> * make NOT NULL constraints have pg_constraint entries, just like CHECK
> >> constraints
>
> > This is now a TODO item (I just updated the description):
>
> > Store the constraint names of NOT NULL constraints
>
> I was intending to do that yesterday, but lost interest after
> discovering how many duplicate, obsolete, and/or mutually contradictory
> TODO entries there are related to constraints. That needs to be cleaned
> up and consolidated sometime.
>
> Also, what is wrong with the precise statement of the TODO item that
> Nikhil gave? The one you gave would encourage someone to waste time on
> a 100% wrong implementation (like adding a constraint name column to
> pg_attribute).
I felt the original wording would be unclear in explaining the problem
behavior; you are right the original wording was clearer for correcting
the problem. This updated wording works for both audiences, I think:
Move NOT NULL constraint information to pg_constraint Currently NOT NULL constraints are stored in pg_attribute
withoutanydesignation of their origins, e.g. primary keys. One manifestproblem is that dropping a PRIMARY KEY
constraintdoes not remove theNOT NULL constraint designation.
*http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19768.1238680878@sss.pgh.pa.us
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
