Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date
Msg-id 20090401173756.GB21229@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:33:26PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Saturday 28 March 2009 00:42:28 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I assume directory permissions controlling access to the socket file
> > would be enough.  You are going to have to set up SSL certificates
> > anyway for this so isn't that just as hard as telling the client where
> > the socket file is located?
>
> The permissions on the socket file or the containing directory doesn't tell
> much by itself, because you also need to consider who owns it.  What that
> basically comes down to is that the client would need to specify something
> like, "I only want a connection to a server owned by 'postgres'."  But the
> client currently has no way of saying that, so we'd need to invent something
> new.

If you're going to get complicated, go the whole way do SO_PEERCRED on
the socket, then you get the UID of the server...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More message encoding woes
Next
From: "Vincze, Tamas"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to speed up pg_dump