Robert Treat wrote:
> Actually I find the inconsistency to hurt usability, which is typically what
> you get with inconsistent interfaces.
>
> I'm not certain, but I think I would be happier if we did:
>
> \d* user space objects
> \d*S include system objects
>
> For those that want system only, do
> \d*S pg_catalog.
> ( if you want to argue temp/toast, adjust the search accordingly)
>
> I think the trick to getting this working is to enforce this with search
> patterns *and* tab completion as well. Yes, this means that Tom's desire for
I talked to Robert on IM and found two new reasons to make 'S' assumed
if a pattern is supplied. The first is the use of tab completion:
test=> \df si<tab><tab>sign similar_escape sintest=> \df sin List of functions Schema |
Name| Result data type | Argument data types--------+------+------------------+---------------------(0 rows)
As you can see tab-tab assumes system tables are visible, but current CVS
does not without 'S'. The second case is:
test=> \df pg_catalog.sin List of functions Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data
types--------+------+------------------+---------------------(0rows)
Only \dfS works in this case.
I think we should move forward and assume 'S' for \d* patterns; it is
inconsistent, but usability requires it.
Objections?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
