Re: Can we load all database objects in memory? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Steve Midgley
Subject Re: Can we load all database objects in memory?
Date
Msg-id 20090326165531.E00196342BF@mail.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Can we load all database objects in memory?  (DM <dm.aeqa@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-sql
At 09:20 AM 3/26/2009, pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org wrote:
>Message-Id: <587E5DF3-5859-48DE-93F9-F7B05C37E6D8@rvt.dds.nl>
>From: ries van Twisk <pg@rvt.dds.nl>
>To: DM <dm.aeqa@gmail.com>
>In-Reply-To: 
><eae6a62a0903251220p2edd379en50d17541edef065f@mail.gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Can we load all database objects in memory?
>Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:07:21 -0500
>References: 
><eae6a62a0903251220p2edd379en50d17541edef065f@mail.gmail.com>
>X-Archive-Number: 200903/89
>X-Sequence-Number: 32332
>
>The short answer is no, you cannot force PostgreSQL to load all
>objects into memory.
>
>However when you proper configure PostgreSQL most, if not all of 
>your
>data will be cached
>by the OS and/or PostgreSQL shared memory system.
>
>On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, DM wrote:
>
>>I have a database of 10GB.
>>My Database Server has a RAM of 16GB
>>
>>Is there a way that I can load all the database objects to memory?
Since you have such an abundance of RAM, I'd think you could simulate 
this feature by setting up some kind of psql script to pull down all 
10gb of data through Postgres when the server first boots - possibly 
just a bunch of "select * from [table];" commands for each table in 
your catalog. All/most of the data should be cached into RAM by the OS 
at that point.

Also, I don't know what the state of the art is regarding RAM disks 
these days, but for a read-only database, that seems like an option 
(10gb of ram disk for your read-only data and 6 gb of ram for OS and 
Pg).

Steve



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Table to Excel
Next
From: Dominik Piekarski
Date:
Subject: Add: Special sort querstion