Erwin Moller wrote:
> I thought a transaction that is rolled back, rolls back *everything*
> done in that transaction.
> Appearantly sequences are not included.
Yes. This is actually a desirable property, because it allows sequences
to work fine in concurrent scenarios (which are, after all, the whole
point of sequences).
If you actually need an incremental number with no gaps (which is rare
but not unseen), you need to use some other mechanism, which will
probably involve a lock to prevent concurrency.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
