Re: vacuumdb --freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: vacuumdb --freeze
Date
Msg-id 200902191739.n1JHdvC01128@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuumdb --freeze  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: vacuumdb --freeze  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at> writes:
> > I am still answering here because my question was related to upgrade.
> > I think you need to turn off autovacuum before freezing to avoid a later analyze
> > that unfreezes pg_class (or the stats table).
> 
> vacuum analyze doesn't unfreeze pg_class.  It could create unfrozen
> tuples in pg_statistic, perhaps, but we could easily fix that by
> truncating pg_statistic afterwards (its not like there will be useful
> data there...)

I have added --analyze to the vacuumdb command and documented its
purpose.

> The end goal is going to be to have all this work happen in a standalone
> backend, rather than risk firing up the postmaster while the database is
> in an unstable state.  So I would counsel spending as little effort as
> possible on filing off rough edges that are related to the
> using-a-postmaster scenario.

Any idea how to do that?  Would we have to leave the libpq API?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --freeze
Next
From: decibel
Date:
Subject: Knuth "nested parens" picture