* Devrim GÜNDÜZ (devrim@gunduz.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > With my other hat on (the red one) what I'm concerned about is whether
> > this patch will ever produce a feature that I could turn on in the
> > standard Red Hat/Fedora build of Postgres.
>
> FWIW, as you know, sepostgresql is already included in Fedora. You can
> continue shipping it as a seperate RPM set.
hrmpf, I wonder if that's why RH hasn't been as interested in pushing
for inclusion upstream... Maybe the feel that's a workable solution? I
wouldn't agree... but I don't run RH.
Thanks,
Stephen
