On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Not to pick on you personally, but this is the kind of review that should have
> > happened six months ago, not during a "why is our development process
> > inadequate" discussion on the eve of beta.
>
> Right now, today, in this thread, is the first time that we've had any
> opportunity to debate the design of SEPostgres with knowledgeable people
> other than KaiGai-san. It would likely be better if we started a new
> thread with a more appropriate title, but I see nothing wrong with
> asking pretty fundamental questions.
Except that Bruce and I already checked detailed documentation
references on this very topic months ago. Check with Bruce; he was
careful to point those things out to me, so I'm sure he'll do the same
for you. I'm satisfied, on this point.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
