Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> With my other hat on (the red one) what I'm concerned about is whether
>> this patch will ever produce a feature that I could turn on in the
>> standard Red Hat/Fedora build of Postgres.
>
> FWIW, as you know, sepostgresql is already included in Fedora. You can
> continue shipping it as a seperate RPM set.
That is non-ideal. Getting the capability in to the standard database shipped
with RHEL is very important to me and my customers.
Since you can turn this off with GUC I don't see why it makes sense to ship 2
databases (nevermind the maintenance issues)
