Re: generic reloptions improvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: generic reloptions improvement
Date
Msg-id 20081229032636.GC5035@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic reloptions improvement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: generic reloptions improvement
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:

> > I'm intending to have a new routine which would reserve a value at
> > runtime.  This value would be later be passed by the AM to create new
> > options on the table.
> 
> What do you mean by "at runtime"?  Surely the value would have to remain
> stable across database restarts, since it's going to relate to stuff
> that is in catalog entries.

No, there's no need for the value to be stable across restart; what's
stored in catalogs is the option name, which is linked to the kind
number only in the parser table.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities This doesn't do any
Next
From: "Hitoshi Harada"
Date:
Subject: Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance