Gcc 4.4 causes abort in plpython. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kurt Roeckx
Subject Gcc 4.4 causes abort in plpython.
Date
Msg-id 20081226174750.GA26150@roeckx.be
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Gcc 4.4 causes abort in plpython.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I've been trying a gcc 4.4 snapshot (20081213) on buildfarm member
panda.  It gets a abort during the pl-install-check part.

Here is the backtrace:
Core was generated by `postgres: build-farm pl_regression [local] SELECT '.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
[New process 3588]
#0  0x00002b41e7662ed5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00002b41e7662ed5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002b41e76643f3 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x00000000006a889d in ExceptionalCondition (   conditionName=<value optimized out>, errorType=<value optimized
out>,  fileName=<value optimized out>, lineNumber=<value optimized out>)   at assert.c:57
 
#3  0x00000000006c8033 in MemoryContextAlloc (context=0x0, size=112)   at mcxt.c:507
#4  0x00000000006abe82 in CopyErrorData () at elog.c:1082
#5  0x00002b41ea61a755 in PLy_spi_execute_plan (ob=<value optimized out>,   list=<value optimized out>, limit=<value
optimizedout>) at plpython.c:2587
 
#6  0x00002b41ea61a9a6 in PLy_spi_execute (self=<value optimized out>,   args=0x2b41eae11d20) at plpython.c:2477
#7  0x00002b41ea8e5fdd in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()  from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#8  0x00002b41ea8e7385 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()  from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#9  0x00002b41ea8e7bfd in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()  from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#10 0x00002b41ea8e7df2 in PyEval_EvalCode () from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
#11 0x00002b41ea61b89b in PLy_procedure_call (proc=0xc62880,   kargs=<value optimized out>, vargs=<value optimized
out>)at plpython.c:962
 
#12 0x00002b41ea61eaae in PLy_function_handler (fcinfo=<value optimized out>,   proc=<value optimized out>) at
plpython.c:790
#13 0x00002b41ea61f359 in plpython_call_handler (fcinfo=<value optimized out>)   at plpython.c:355
#14 0x000000000054f171 in ExecMakeFunctionResult (   fcache=<value optimized out>, econtext=<value optimized out>,
isNull=0xbdd3d0"\177~\177\177\177\177\177\177", isDone=0xbdd488)   at execQual.c:1635
 
#15 0x000000000054a39b in ExecProject (projInfo=<value optimized out>,   isDone=<value optimized out>) at
execQual.c:4922
#16 0x000000000055dfab in ExecResult (node=0xbdc7d8) at nodeResult.c:155
#17 0x0000000000549928 in ExecProcNode (node=0xbdc7d8) at execProcnode.c:338
#18 0x00000000005474c9 in standard_ExecutorRun (   queryDesc=<value optimized out>, direction=ForwardScanDirection,
count=<valueoptimized out>) at execMain.c:1343
 
#19 0x00000000005fc878 in PortalRunSelect (portal=0xbd6c58,   forward=<value optimized out>, count=0, dest=0xbd4c60) at
pquery.c:942
#20 0x00000000005fdd30 in PortalRun (portal=<value optimized out>,   count=<value optimized out>, isTopLevel=<value
optimizedout>,   dest=<value optimized out>, altdest=<value optimized out>,   completionTag=<value optimized out>) at
pquery.c:768
#21 0x00000000005f90cd in exec_simple_query (   query_string=<value optimized out>) at postgres.c:992
#22 0x00000000005fa707 in PostgresMain (argc=<value optimized out>,   argv=<value optimized out>, username=<value
optimizedout>)   at postgres.c:3569
 
#23 0x00000000005c7227 in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:3258
#24 0x00000000005c963d in PostmasterMain (argc=3, argv=0xaf3720)   at postmaster.c:1031
#25 0x0000000000571695 in main (argc=3, argv=0xaf3710) at main.c:188
(gdb) frame 3
#3  0x00000000006c8033 in MemoryContextAlloc (context=0x0, size=112)   at mcxt.c:507
507             AssertArg(MemoryContextIsValid(context));
(gdb) p context
$1 = (MemoryContext) 0x0

I've tried looking at it, but I have no idea what could be wrong.

Note that this might be a compiler bug, and it would be nice
if someone could figure out if it's a bug in pgsql or gcc.


kurt


Kurt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused include/storage/itempos.h
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Window-functions patch handling of aggregates