Hi,
I'm wondering if following behavior of PostgreSQL regarding lock
conflict is an expected one. Here's a scenario:
Session A:BEGIN;SELECT * FROM pg_class limit 1; -- acquires access share lock
Session B:BEGIN;ALTER TABLE pg_class ....; -- waits for acquiring access exclusive lock(wil fail
anywaythough)
Session C:SELECT * FROM pg_class...; -- whatever query which needs to acces pg_class will be
blocked, too bad...
I understand that B should wait for aquiring lock, but Should C wait
for?
Also, it seems that an attacker could do a denial service attack if he
could open session A and B, since other users on session C or
following sessions will be blocked.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
