Re: Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto
Date
Msg-id 200812160010.mBG0AFJ08851@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto  (Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com>)
Responses Re: Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Would someone who understand pgcrypto please review this?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1216335149.11208.9.camel@bloodnok.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marc Munro wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> I am attaching a patch to eliminate duplicate b64_encode and decode
> functions from pgcrypto, and to expose those functions for use by
> add-ins (I want to use them in Veil).
> 
> The patch was made against CVS head today.  It compiles and tests
> successfully.  Though I was unable to run pgrypto regression tests, I
> did give the b64 encoding a sanity check.
> 
> I also added a b64_char() function that is now used from pgcrypto.  This
> allowed me to remove the duplicate _base64 character array.
> 
> I hope this is the correct place to submit the patch.  The wiki
> (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch) refers to
> pgsql-patches but I believe that is now deprecated.
> 
> 
> __
> Marc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Looking for someone with MinGW